3.9 Article

Recommendation for standardized medical care for children and adolescents with long COVID Statement of a multidisciplinary pediatric expert group of the DGKJ convent societies (status: February 2022)

期刊

MONATSSCHRIFT KINDERHEILKUNDE
卷 170, 期 6, 页码 539-547

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00112-021-01408-1

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; Long COVID; Children; Consensus; Germany

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This consensus paper provides a detailed overview on the clinical aspects of long COVID in children and adolescents. It offers expert-based recommendations for the clinical management of long COVID in this population, based on the currently available academic evidence. The paper includes screening questions, suggestions for medical history and diagnostic evaluation, as well as a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach.
This current consensus paper for long COVID complements the existing AWMF S1 guidelines for long COVID with a detailed overview on the various clinical aspects of long COVID in children and adolescents. Members of 19 different pediatric societies of the DGKJ convent and collaborating societies together provide expert-based recommendations for the clinical management of long COVID based on the currently available but limited academic evidence for long COVID in children and adolescents. It contains screening questions for long COVID and suggestions for a structured, standardized pediatric medical history and diagnostic evaluation for patients with suspected long COVID. A time and resource-saving questionnaire, which takes the clinical complexity of long COVID into account, is offered via the DGKJ and DGPI websites as well as additional questionnaires suggested for an advanced screening of specific neurocognitive and/or psychiatric symptoms including post-exertional malaise (PEM) and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). According to the individual medical history as well as clinical signs and symptoms a step by step diagnostic procedure and a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach are recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据