4.6 Article

Influence of Homogenizing Methodology on Mechanical and Tribological Performance of Powder Metallurgy Processed Titanium Composites Reinforced by Graphene Nanoplatelets

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092666

关键词

titanium; graphene nanoplatelets; titanium matrix composites; morphology; mechanical properties; tribological properties

资金

  1. Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, in Saudi Arabia [IFP-KKU-2020/9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the impact of different mixing modes on the mechanical and tribological properties of 0.25 wt%GNP-Ti composites prepared through powder metallurgy route. Dry ball milling results in better homogenization of GNPs in the Ti matrix, leading to higher micro Vickers hardness and lower wear loss compared to wet ball milling and rotator mixing. Wet ball milling and rotator mixing show aggregation and bundling of GNPs, leading to higher wear loss in wear tests.
In the present work, 0.25 wt%GNP-Ti composites were prepared through powder metallurgy route by adopting three types of mixing modes to investigate the extent of mixing on the mechanical and tribological properties. Dry ball milling, wet ball milling, and rotator mixing were independently employed to homogenize the composite constituents. Three types of composite powders obtained were subsequently sintered into composite pellets by cold compaction followed by vacuum sintering. Morphological investigation of composite powders performed by SEM revealed better homogenization of GNPs in Ti matrix for dry ball milled composite powder, whereas wet ball milled and rotator mixed composite powders showed aggregation and bundling of GNPs. Micro Vickers hardness of composites produced via dry ball milling is 4.56% and 15.7% higher than wet ball milled and rotator mixed samples, respectively. Wear test performed by pin-on-disk tribometer showed higher wear loss for wet ball milled and rotator mixed composites in comparison to dry ball milled.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据