4.6 Article

GlycoTAIL and FlexiTAIL as Half-Life Extension Modules for Recombinant Antibody Fragments

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27103272

关键词

scFv; diabody; scFv-EHD2 fusion protein; CEA; FAP; hydrodynamic radius; half-life extension; PEG mimetic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two different PEG mimetic approaches, GlycoTAIL and FlexiTAIL, were used to increase the hydrodynamic radius of antibody fragments and improve their pharmacokinetic properties. The modified proteins exhibited prolonged half-life and increased drug disposition in mice without compromising stability and antigen binding. The FlexiTAIL sequence of 248 residues had the strongest effect, suggesting that it is a flexible and modular system for improving protein pharmacokinetics.
Many therapeutic proteins are small in size and are rapidly cleared from circulation. Consequently, half-life extension strategies have emerged to improve pharmacokinetic properties, including fusion or binding to long-lasting serum proteins, chemical modifications with hydrophilic polymers such as PEGylation, or, more recently, fusion to PEG mimetic polypeptides. In the present study, two different PEG mimetic approaches, the GlycoTAIL and the FlexiTAIL, were applied to increase the hydrodynamic radius of antibody fragments of different sizes and valencies, including scFv, diabody, and scFv-EHD2 fusion proteins. The GlycoTAIL and FlexiTAIL sequences of varying lengths are composed of aliphatic and hydrophilic residues, with the GlycoTAIL furthermore comprising N-glycosylation sites. All modified proteins could be produced in a mammalian expression system without reducing stability and antigen binding, and all modified proteins exhibited a prolonged half-life and increased drug disposition in mice. The strongest effects were observed for proteins comprising a FlexiTAIL of 248 residues. Thus, the GlycoTAIL and FlexiTAIL sequences represent a flexible and modular system to improve the pharmacokinetic properties of proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据