4.6 Article

Application of Rhamnolipids as Dispersing Agents for the Fabrication of Composite MnO2-Carbon Nanotube Electrodes for Supercapacitors

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27051659

关键词

manganese oxide; carbon nanotube; composite; supercapacitor; rhamnolipids; dispersant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the use of rhamnolipids (RL) as efficient natural biosurfactants for the fabrication of nanocomposite MnO2-carbon nanotube electrodes for supercapacitors. The RL act as co-dispersants for MnO2 and carbon nanotubes, enabling efficient mixing and resulting in advanced capacitive properties. The approach offers advantages such as simplicity and the use of a biocompatible RL biosurfactant.
The high theoretical capacitance of MnO2 renders it a promising material for the cathodes of asymmetric supercapacitors. The good dispersion of MnO2 and conductive additives in a nanocomposite electrode is a key factor for efficient electrode performance. This article describes, for the first time, the application of rhamnolipids (RL) as efficient natural biosurfactants for the fabrication of nanocomposite MnO2-carbon nanotube electrodes for supercapacitors. RL act as co-dispersants for MnO2 and carbon nanotubes and facilitate their efficient mixing, which allows for advanced capacitive properties at an active mass of 40 mg cm(-2) in Na2SO4 electrolytes. The highest capacitance obtained from the cyclic voltammetry data at a scan rate of 2 mV s(-1) is 8.10 F cm(-2) (202.6 F g(-1)). The highest capacitance obtained from the galvanostatic charge-discharge data at a current density of 3 mA cm(-2) is 8.65 F cm(-2) (216.16 F g(-1)). The obtained capacitances are higher than the capacitances of MnO2-based electrodes of the same active mass reported in the literature. The approach developed in this investigation is simple compared to other techniques used for the fabrication of electrodes with high active mass. It offers advantages of using a biocompatible RL biosurfactant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据