4.4 Article

Factors Affecting the Success of Next-Generation Sequencing in Cytology Specimens

期刊

CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY
卷 123, 期 11, 页码 659-668

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21597

关键词

cytology; Ion Torrent; limited samples; molecular; mutational analysis; next-generation sequencing; pre-analytical factors

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Chapman Foundation
  3. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center [P30 CA016672]
  4. European Hematology Association [TRTH28] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The use of cytology specimens for next-generation sequencing (NGS) is particularly challenging because of the unconventional substrate of smears and the often limited sample volume. An analysis of factors affecting NGS testing in cytologic samples may help to increase the frequency of successful testing. METHODS: This study reviewed variables associated with all in-house cytology cases (n = 207) that were analyzed by NGS with the Ion Torrent platform during a 10-month interval. A statistical analysis was performed to measure the effects of the DNA input threshold, specimen preparation, slide type, tumor fraction, DNA yield, and cytopathologist bias. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four of 207 cases (79%) were successfully sequenced by NGS; 43 (21%) failed because of either a low DNA yield or a template/library preparation failure. The median estimated tumor fraction and DNA concentration for the successfully sequenced cases were 70% and 2.5 ng/mu L, respectively, whereas they were 60% and 0.2 ng/mu L, respectively, for NGS failures. Cell block sections were tested in 91 cases, and smears were used in 116 cases. NGS success positively correlated with the DNA yield but not the tumor fraction. Cell block preparations showed a higher success rate than smears. Frosted-tip slides yielded significantly more DNA than fully frosted slides. Lowering the input DNA concentration below the manufacturer's recommended threshold of 10 ng (> 0.85 ng/mu L) resulted in a marked increase in the NGS success rate from 58.6% to 89.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The failure of NGS with cytology samples is usually a result of suboptimal DNA due to multiple pre-analytical factors. Knowledge of these factors will allow better selection of cytology material for mutational analysis. (C) 2015 American Cancer Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据