4.7 Article

Spider webs as eDNA samplers: Biodiversity assessment across the tree of life

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 2534-2545

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13629

关键词

biodiversity monitoring; environmental DNA; metabarcoding; microbial communities

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [Z1-8143, P1-0236, P4-0407, P1-0198, P1-0255, J1-9163, J1-1703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concept of environmental DNA (eDNA) involves using nucleic acids from organisms found in the environment. Recent studies have successfully detected a wide range of eDNA from various environments, and spider webs may represent a promising new source of eDNA. Research has shown that genetic remains on spider webs can be used to detect different organisms and provide detailed temporal and spatial information.
The concept of environmental DNA (eDNA) utilizes nucleic acids of organisms directly from the environment. Recent breakthrough studies have successfully detected a wide spectrum of prokaryotic and eukaryotic eDNA from a variety of environments, ranging from ancient to modern, and from terrestrial to aquatic. With their diversity and ubiquity in nature, spider webs might act as powerful biofilters and could thus represent a promising new source of eDNA, but their utility under natural field conditions is severely understudied. Here, we bridge this knowledge gap to establish spider webs as a source of eDNA with far reaching implications. First, we conducted a field study to track specific arthropod targets from different spider webs. We then used high-throughput amplicon sequencing of taxonomic barcodes to investigate the utility of spider web eDNA for biodiversity monitoring of animals, fungi and bacteria. Our results show that genetic remains on spider webs allow the detection of even the smallest target organisms. We also demonstrate that eDNA from spider webs is useful in research of community compositions across the different domains of life, with potentially highly detailed temporal and spatial information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据