4.7 Article

Gut microbiota composition does not associate with toxoplasma infection in rats

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 31, 期 14, 页码 3963-3970

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.16552

关键词

behavioural manipulation; inflammation; microbiome; microbiota; parasite; toxoplasma

资金

  1. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0062/2018]
  2. Ecological Society of Australia
  3. Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
  4. Australian Wildlife Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that Toxoplasma infection did not induce widespread differences in the bacterial community composition of the gastrointestinal tract of rats, but revealed sex differences in the bacterial community composition.
Toxoplasma infection in intermediate host species closely associates with inflammation. This association has led to suggestions that the behavioural changes associated with infection may be indirectly driven by the resulting sustained inflammation rather than a direct behavioural manipulation by the parasite. If this is correct, sustained inflammation in chronically infected rodents should present as widespread differences in the gastrointestinal microbiota due to the dependency between the composition of these microbiota and sustained inflammation. We conducted a randomized controlled experiment in rats that were assigned to a Toxoplasma-treatment, placebo-treatment or negative control group. We euthanised rats during the chronic phase of infection, collected their caecal stool samples and sequenced the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene to characterize the bacterial community in these samples. Toxoplasma infection did not induce widespread differences in the bacterial community composition of the gastrointestinal tract of rats. Rather, we found sex differences in the bacterial community composition of rats. We conclude that it is unlikely that sustained inflammation is the mechanism driving the highly specific behavioural changes observed in Toxoplasma-positive rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据