4.4 Article

Effect of Lysosomes on Extending Vase Life of Cut Flowers

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 64, 期 12, 页码 1340-1349

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s12033-022-00509-w

关键词

Cut flower; Lysosomal enzymes; Senescence; Ornamental value

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2021R1A2C2093580]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1A2C2093580] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that pretreatment with lysosomal enzymes can extend the vase life and retain the ornamental value of cut flowers, affecting factors such as stomata, microbial population, and soluble carbohydrate contents. This has significant importance in improving marketability of cut flowers in the flower industry, making lysosomal enzymes a potential eco-friendly and effective material for pretreatment agents.
In this study, we were investigated the effect of lysosomal extracts (named as lysosomal enzymes) on extending the vase life of cut flowers. The results confirmed that senescence of cut freesia treated with lysosomal enzymes delayed. Also, the results for cut roses and lilies showed a similar pattern. In the case of them the fresh weight was lower than that of the control group, but time the ornamental value was retained increased by about 2 days. The reasons have explained as results by the change including stomata, accumulation of microbial population, and soluble carbohydrate contents. In conclusion, pretreatment with lysosomal enzymes has enhanced vase life and ornamental value of cut flowers. It has an important significance in improving the marketability of cut flowers in the flower industry. Therefore, lysosomal enzymes have the potential to be used sufficiently as eco-friendly and effective materials for pretreatment agents in the cut flower industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据