4.4 Article

Physical activity in elderly kidney transplant patients with multiple renal arteries

期刊

MINERVA MEDICA
卷 113, 期 1, 页码 119-127

出版社

EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4806.20.06573-8

关键词

Kidney transplantation; Elder nutritional physiological phenomena; Vascular malthnnations; Kidney; Exercise

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that kidneys with vascular abnormalities can be successfully transplanted, with similar rates of surgical complications and 5-year survival rates in both the SRA and MRA groups. Individualized physical activity programs also yielded comparable excellent results in improving physical capacities, arterial pressure, lipid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, quality of life, and physical and mental status for both groups.
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the gold standard for treatment of patients with end-stage-renal disease. To expand the donor reserve, it is necessary to use marginal/suboptimal kidneys. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the short/long-term outcome of 34 KT elderly patients who received allografts with vascular abnormalities (MRA group), in comparison with 34 KT patients who received a kidney with a single renal artery (SRA group) pair-matched by age, length of time on dialysis, comorbidity and donor age. RESULTS: All participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire at KT, and then 4, 8, and 12 weeks after transplantation. Our data indicate that kidney with vascular anatomical variants may be successfully transplanted, since the overall rate of surgical complications was 20.6% in the SRA group and 17.6% in the MRA group and that the 5-year survival rate after KT was 100% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The data also underlined that individualized physical activity programs induced similar excellent results in both groups, improving physical capacities, arterial pressure, lipid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, quality of life and physical and mental status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据