4.7 Article

A comparative study of the desilication of channel- and cage-like zeolites*

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.111903

关键词

Zeolites; ZSM-5; SSZ-13; Alkaline post treatment; Desilication; Hierarchy; Pore topology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zeolites are important catalysts in the chemical industry, but their narrow micropore system limits mass transport. Introducing a second larger pore system through desilication can overcome these limitations. The influence of framework topology on the formation of mesoporosity by desilication was investigated, and it was found that cage-like zeolites are more susceptible to desilication.
Zeolites are very important catalysts in the chemical industry, but their intrinsic narrow micropore system often restricts the mass transport of reactant and product molecules. These mass transport limitations can be overcome by introducing a second larger pore system (meso-/macropores) into the zeolite crystals. Over the past decade, desilication of zeolites has emerged as a simple post-synthetic process to implement mesoporosity into zeolites. Here we present the investigation of the influence of framework topology on the formation of mesoporosity by the desilication process. For this purpose, the desilication behaviour of a channel-like system (ZSM-5/MFI-type) and a cage-like system (SSZ-13/CHA-type) are compared. It has been found that cage-like zeolite (SSZ-13) is more susceptible to the desilication process. The desilication of SSZ-13 zeolite resulted in drastic reduction of microporosity and crystallinity, while the microporosity and crystallinity of ZSM-5 gradually decreased with desilication time. By systematically studying the influence of various desilication parameters (e.g. treatment time, temperature and alkaline concentration), it has been found that there exists a direct correlation between the extraction of silicon and mesoporosity formation for the channel-like zeolite (ZSM-5) whereas in case of cagelike zeolite (SSZ-13) no direct correlation has been found.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据