4.7 Article

Pore architecture evolution and OER catalytic activity of hollow Co/Zn Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.111814

关键词

ZIF; Hollow frameworks; Positron annihilation; OER; Catalysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tunable porosity through hollow features at nanoscale in metal organic frameworks (MOFs) has enormous potential applications in catalysis, with hollow core/shell frameworks showing improved catalytic activity compared to pure ZIF-67 nanocrystals.
Tunable porosity through hollow features at nanoscale in metal organic frameworks (MOFs) can lead to enormous applications especially in catalysis. Hollow ZIF-67/ZIF-8 (core/shell) frameworks have been synthesized using solvothermal synthesis in methanol, wherein preformed ZIF-67 nanocrystals have been used as core. Using this method, hollow core/shell frameworks have been synthesized by excavation of ZIF-67 core and concurrent deposition of ZIF-8 shell for varying time. The crystal structure and chemical bonding of the frameworks have been characterized using X-ray diffraction, FTIR and Raman spectroscopy. Morphology of the hollow frameworks has been investigated using FE-SEM and EDX. Positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy in combination with small angle X-ray scattering have been used to characterize the multiscale pore architecture (ultramicropores to mesopores) of these hollow frameworks. The sodalite topology and associated pore architecture of ZIFs are retained during the synthesis of hollow framework, however the excavation of core leads to enhancement in mesopores. Hollow frameworks have been tested for their performance towards oxygen evolution reaction. The hollow frameworks show improvement in the catalytic activity as compared to pure ZIF-67 nanocrystals. It is proposed that in order to further improve their catalytic performance, post-synthesis modifications for enhancement in stability of pore network of shell and loading of active species are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据