4.7 Article

Evaluation of matrix effect in determination of mevinphos stereoisomers in tobacco by supercritical fluid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107174

关键词

Supercritical fluid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-MS/MS); Matrix effect; Tobacco; Stereoselective separation; Mevinphos

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercritical fluid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-MS/MS) is an important tool for analyzing stereoisomers in complex matrices. This study investigated the influence of matrix effect on stereoselective analysis of mevinphos in tobacco by SFC-MS/MS. Experiments showed that a QuEChERS method combined with a dilution strategy effectively eliminated most of the matrix effects.
Supercritical fluid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-MS/MS) is an important tool for the analysis of stereoisomer in complex matrices. Matrix effect is a critical factor that can significantly compromise the accuracy of pesticide residue analyses by mass spectrometry. The influence of matrix effect in the stereoselective analysis of mevinphos in tobacco by SFC-MS/MS was studied. Experiments have been performed to compare the response of mevinphos isomers in standard solutions prepared in acetonitrile with their responses in tobacco extracts. The presence and extent of matrix effects are simultaneously affected by several factors (matrix concentration, matrix type, matrix dilution, and chromatographic separation conditions). In this study, a QuEChERS method coupled with a dilution strategy eliminated most of the matrix effects. The mean recoveries for all isomers were 85.2%-99.3%, with 2.2%-7.7% intra-day relative standard deviations (RSDs) and 3.6%-6.9% inter-day RSDs at 0.05, 0.2 and 1.0 mg/kg levels. Good coefficients of determination (R-2 >= 0.9995) were achieved for all studied isomers over the concentration range of 25-500 ng/mL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据