4.7 Article

Disruption of Genes Encoding Putative Zwitterionic Capsular Polysaccharides of Diverse Intestinal Bacteroides Reduces the Induction of Host Anti-Inflammatory Factors

期刊

MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 85, 期 4, 页码 1620-1629

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-022-02037-1

关键词

Zwitterionic capsular polysaccharides; ZPS; PSA; Treg; IL-10

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial zwitterionic capsular polysaccharides (ZPS) have been found to modulate host immune responses, including inducing anti-inflammatory T cells and regulatory cells. In this study, researchers discovered that ZPS-deficient strains of common gut commensals had a reduced ability to induce anti-inflammatory T cells and promote IL-10 production. Additionally, they found that ZPS may play a role in shifting macrophage cytokine responses to a more anti-inflammatory state.
Bacterial zwitterionic capsular polysaccharides (ZPS), such as polysaccharide A (PSA) of the intestinal commensal Bacteroides fragilis, have been shown to modulate T cells, including inducing anti-inflammatory IL-10-secreting T regulatory cells (Tregs). We previously used a genomic screen to identify diverse host-associated bacteria with the predicted genetic capacity to produce ZPSs related to PSA of B. fragilis and hypothesized that genetic disruption (KO) of a key functional gene within these operons would reduce the anti-inflammatory activity of these bacteria. We found that ZPS-KO bacteria in two common gut commensals, Bacteroides uniformis and Bacteroides cellulosilyticus, had a reduced ability to induce Tregs and IL-10 in stimulations of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Additionally, we found that macrophage stimulated with either wildtype B. fragilis or B. uniformis produced significantly more IL-10 than KOs, indicating a potentially novel function of ZPS of shifting the cytokine response in macrophages to a more anti-inflammatory state. These findings support the hypothesis that these related ZPS may represent a shared strategy to modulate host immune responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据