4.7 Article

Multiplex genome editing of mammalian cells for producing recombinant heparin

期刊

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 155-165

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2022.01.002

关键词

Heparin; Heparan sulfate; Anticoagulation; Metabolic engineering; Mastocytoma; Synthetic biology

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1622959, 1842736, 2026188]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1842736, 1622959] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Translational Impacts
  5. Dir for Tech, Innovation, & Partnerships [2026188] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heparin, an essential anticoagulant, is currently sourced from vulnerable animal populations. This study demonstrates the feasibility of producing high anticoagulant potency heparin sulfate through genome engineering in cell culture, providing a potential alternative to animal sources.
Heparin is an essential anticoagulant used for treating and preventing thrombosis. However, the complexity of heparin has hindered the development of a recombinant source, making its supply dependent on a vulnerable animal population. In nature, heparin is produced exclusively in mast cells, which are not suitable for commercial production, but mastocytoma cells are readily grown in culture and make heparan sulfate, a closely related glycosaminoglycan that lacks anticoagulant activity. Using gene expression profiling of mast cells as a guide, a multiplex genome engineering strategy was devised to produce heparan sulfate with high anticoagulant potency and to eliminate contaminating chondroitin sulfate from mastocytoma cells. The heparan sulfate purified from engineered cells grown in chemically defined medium has anticoagulant potency that exceeds porcinederived heparin and confers anticoagulant activity to the blood of healthy mice. This work demonstrates the feasibility of producing recombinant heparin from mammalian cell culture as an alternative to animal sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据