4.4 Review

Pulmonary arterial hypertension

期刊

MEDICINA CLINICA
卷 158, 期 12, 页码 622-629

出版社

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2022.01.003

关键词

Pulmonary arterial hypertension; Risk assessment; Right ventricle; Pulmonary vascular resistance; Pulmonary vasodilators

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare disease with adverse remodeling of the arterial tree, leading to increased vascular resistance, right ventricular overload, and heart failure. Diagnosis and treatment are often delayed due to nonspecific clinical manifestations and lack of understanding of the pathology, resulting in a poor prognosis. The latest recommendations emphasize early differential diagnosis from other causes of pulmonary hypertension to initiate appropriate treatment based on risk assessment. In recent years, improvements in diagnostic processes, the development of new treatments, and the establishment of specialized referral units have significantly improved the prognosis and quality of life for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare disease characterized by adverse remodeling of the arterial tree leading to increased vascular resistance with subsequent increase in right ventricular afterload and eventual development of heart failure. The nonspecific clinical manifestations and lack of knowledge of pathology lead to a poor prognosis associated with delay in diagnosis and initiation of treatment. The most recent recommendations focus on optimizing the early differential diagnosis with other causes of pulmonary hypertension to initiate appropriate treatment based on the mortality risk estimation. In the last years, with the improvement in the diagnostic process, the emergence of new specific treatments, and the creation of specialized referral units for this pathology, the prognosis, and quality of life of patients with PAH have improved significantly. (C) 2022 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据