4.5 Article

Do osmotic pressure and hygroscopicity of areca nut related products drive extracellular fluid loss and condensation of collagen bundles in oral submucous fibrosis?

期刊

MEDICAL HYPOTHESES
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2022.110836

关键词

Oral submucous fibrosis; Betel quid; Fibrosis; Osmotic pressure; Hygroscopicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new hypothesis for the pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis, suggesting that osmotic pressure and hygroscopicity of betel quid amalgamation in the oral cavity are the causative mechanisms. Laboratory experiments and animal studies are proposed to evaluate the hypothesis and potentially improve the management strategies for this disease.
Increased production and decreased degradation of collagen fibers are the two of hallmarks of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF). To date pathogenesis of OSMF has been perceived from the perspective of chemical constituents of the betel quid (BQ) and their impact on the signaling pathways related to fibrosis. In the present paper, physical properties such as osmotic pressure and hygroscopicity of the BQ amalgamation formed in the oral cavity are proposed as the causative mechanisms for OSMF. The detailed mechanism of osmotic pressure gradient development between extracellular fluid and the amalgamated BQ in the oral cavity has been deliberated. In addition, the hygroscopicity of BQ is also projected as a complementary mechanism to the osmotic pressure mechanism for OSMF development. Various laboratory experiments, cell culture models, and animal studies are proposed to evaluate the hypothesis. Since OSMF can also occur in only areca nut chewing individuals, we put forth the proposed mechanism as complementary to the already known pathogenesis. This novel hypothesis addresses the age-old problem related to the management of OSMF and extracellular fluid restoration strategies would drastically change and probably improve the clinical status and reduce the malignant potential of OSMF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据