4.4 Article

In-vivo tibiofemoral kinematics of the normal knee during closed and open kinetic chain exercises: A comparative study of box squat and seated knee extension

期刊

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103766

关键词

Rehabilitation exercise; Open kinetic chain; Close kinetic chain exercises; In vivo tibiofemoral kinematics; Dual fluoroscopy

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFC0120600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972924, 81871808]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201707010015]
  4. Military Project of Application Fundamentals [CLB18J037]
  5. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [21DZ2208200, 16441908700]
  6. Innovation Research Plan - Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [ZXWF082101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A rehabilitation program after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery is crucial for a satisfactory prognosis. The debate over using closed kinetic chain or open kinetic chain exercises for rehabilitation continues. This study compared the in vivo tibiofemoral kinematics during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises and found valuable insights that can optimize rehabilitation plans for patients post-ACL reconstruction.
A rehabilitation program after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is of great importance to obtain a satisfactory prognosis after surgery. However, there is still an onging debate over whether closed kinetic chain or open kinetic chain exercises should be chosen. Our study was designed to compare the in vivo tibiofemoral kinematics during closed kinetic chain and open kinetic chain exercises. Eighteen healthy volunteers were asked to perform box squat and unloaded/10 kg-loaded seated knee extension. In vivo 3-dimensional analysis of tibiofemoral kinematics of different motions were determined using a dual fluoroscopic imaging system. The study found significantly more tibial anterior displacement during loaded seated knee extension than during unloaded seated knee extension from 25 degrees-50 degrees of knee flexion (p < 0.031). The knees exhibited significantly more internal tibial rotation and lateral tibial translation during the box squat than both seated knee extensions during mid-flexion. In addition, the knees showed less internal-external (IE) range of motion (ROM) from 20 degrees- 75 degrees of flexion (p < 0.001) and medial-lateral (ML) ROM from 75 degrees to full extension (p < 0.006) during box squat than both extensions. This knowledge may help optimize rehabilitation plans for patients post ACL reconstruction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据