4.5 Article

Experimental study on the low-velocity impact and post-impact flexural properties of curved CFRP laminates reinforced by pre-hole Z-pinning (PHZ) technique

期刊

MECHANICS OF ADVANCED MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
卷 30, 期 17, 页码 3479-3490

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2022.2077485

关键词

Z-pin; CFRP laminate; low-velocity impact; residual flexural strength

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an experimental investigation into the effect of Z-pin on the low-velocity impact response and flexural properties after impact of curved CFRP laminates. The experimental results demonstrate that Z-pin can provide an efficient crack arrest mechanism, reduce delamination damage projection area, and improve residual flexural strength.
This paper presents an experimental investigation into the effect of Z-pin on the low-velocity impact response and flexural properties after impact of the curved CFRP laminates. The Z-pinned specimens are produced using a low-damage pre-hole Z-pinning (PHZ) technique. Unpinned and Z-pinned [0/45/-45/90](4S) specimens are both subjected to low-velocity impacts. Nondestructive inspection technique is used to evaluate the internal damage after impact. Subsequently, three-point bending tests are performed to characterize the flexural properties of the impacted specimens. Experimental results indicate that Z-pinned laminate, due to the bridging traction across the delamination cracks provided by pins, can provide an efficient crack arrest mechanism both in impact and bending after impact tests. Compared with the unpinned specimens, the delamination damage projection area (DDPA) is reduced by 28.5-63.5%, depending on the diameter and volume fraction of Z-pin. In addition, Z-pin could improve the residual flexural strength significantly. The specimens with a high Z-pin volume fraction have excellent damage tolerance, leading to an 18.1-76.1% improvement in the residual flexural strength compared with unpinned specimens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据