4.7 Review

A review of resampling techniques in particle filtering framework

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110836

关键词

Particle degeneracy; Particle filter; Particle impoverishment; Resampling; Sequential Bayesian filtering; Genetic algorithm; Signal processing

资金

  1. Mae Fah Luang University [652A03004]
  2. Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the particle filtering method and its application in nonlinear non-Gaussian systems, focusing on the impact of the resampling step on filtering performance. It also classifies and describes recent efficient resampling schemes based on particle weights.
A particle filtering (PF) is a sequential Bayesian filtering method suitable for non-linear non-Gaussian systems, which is widely used to estimate the states of parameters of interest that cannot be obtained directly but still relate to noisy measured data with probability masses. Possible values of targeted parameters (or particles) are sampled according to the related prior knowledge, with their probabilities (or weights) evaluated from the likelihood of being the true values of those parameters. However, most have negligible weights. The standard PF algorithm consists of three steps as particle generation, weight calculation or updating and particle regeneration, which is called resampling. The performance of PF depends greatly on the quality of particle regeneration. Resampling preserves and replicates particles with high weights, while those with low weights are eliminated. However, particle impoverishment is a side effect that reduces the diversity of particles used in the next time steps. Therefore, efficient resampling have to guarantee high likelihoods particles. This paper reviews the classification and qualitative descriptions of recent efficient particle weight-based resampling schemes and discusses their characteristics, implementations, advantages and disadvantages of each scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据