4.7 Article

Analysis of mechanical behaviour and fracture interaction of multi-hole rock mass with DIC measurement

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110794

关键词

Cavity-embedded rock; Stress interaction mechanism; Failure evolution; Discrete element method; Digital image correlation measurement

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [52104111]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41772313]
  3. Hunan Science and Technology Planning Project [2019RS3001]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan [2021JJ30819]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the mechanical properties and fracture behavior of rock containing multiple cavities. Experimental and numerical methods are used to analyze the stress evolution and failure coalescence patterns influenced by cavity layout.
To study the mechanical properties and fracture behaviour of rock containing multiple cavities, uniaxial compression experiments were carried out on marble specimens with three rectangular cavities of different layouts. The fracturing behaviour was revealed by digital image correlation (DIC) measurement. Then, discrete element method (DEM) numerical simulations were performed and the stress evolution was analysed to reveal the influence of cavity layout on fracture behaviour and coalescence patterns between them. Results showed that stress evolution and failure coalescence pattern between two cavities can be directly or indirectly influenced by the third cavity. The compressive stress concentrated around the sidewalls of a cavity may suppress the propagation of tensile cracks from other cavities. Combining laboratory and numerical results shows that during the failure evolution, firstly comes the internal coalescence of cavities before instability point, then follows failure from the three-cavity system boundary to the specimen borders resulting in the whole instability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据