4.6 Review

Outcomes and cost of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 32-60

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.01.008

关键词

Cardiac rehabilitation; Systematic review; Mortality; Heart disease risk factors; Quality of life

资金

  1. Toronto General & Toronto Western Hospital Foundation
  2. Peter Munk Cardiac , University Health Network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Women-focused cardiac rehabilitation has positive effects on physical and mental quality of life, but its impact on functional capacity and mortality is inconclusive. Qualitatively, it is associated with lower morbidity, risk factors, and improved psychosocial well-being.
Background: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effects of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on patient outcomes and cost. Methods: Medline, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Emcare were searched for articles from inception through to May 2020. Primary studies of any design were included, with adult females with any cardiac diseases. Women-focused CR comprised programs or sessions with > 50% females, or 1-1 programming tailored to women's preferences. No studies were excluded on the basis of outcome. Two independent reviewers rated citations for potential inclusion, and one extracted data, including on quality, which was checked independently. Random-effects meta-analysis was used where there were >= 3 trials with the same outcome; certainty of evidence for these was determined based on GRADE. For other outcomes, SWiM was applied. Results: 3498 unique citations were identified, of which 28 studies (52 papers) were included (3,697 participants; 11 trials). No meta-analysis could be performed for outcomes with usual care comparisons. Compared to active comparison group, women-focused CR had no meaningful additional effect on functional capacity. Women-focused CR meaningfully improved physical (mean difference [MD]=6.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]=3.14-9.59; I-2=0%; moderate-quality evidence) and mental (MD=4.66, 95% CI=0.21-9.11; I-2=36%; low-quality evidence) quality of life, as well as scores on seven of the eight SF-36 domains. Qualitatively, results showed women-focused CR was associated with lower morbidity, risk factors, and greater psychosocial wellbeing. No effect was observed for mortality. One study reported a favorable economic impact and another reported reduced sick days. Conclusions: Women-focused CR is associated with clinical benefit, although there is mixed evidence and more research is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据