4.6 Article

Analysis of a host-vector dynamics of a dengue disease model with optimal vector control strategy

期刊

MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 31-55

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.12.021

关键词

Vector-borne epidemic model; Dengue; Bifurcation; Optimal control

资金

  1. University Grants Commission, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a biologically well-posed epidemic model to analyze the dynamics of dengue strain. It finds that severe dengue cases are more infectious and continuous mosquito removal significantly reduces the chances of infection. An optimal control problem is formulated, showing that effective non-pharmaceutical precautions and periodic mosquito removal decrease the infection level.
Dengue is a mosquito-borne viral disease where the species Aedes aegypti acts as the vector. In this work, we have proposed a biologically well-posed epidemic model to study the dynamics of dengue strain. It is observed that people infected with severe dengue are more infectious than people with mild symptoms in terms of disease transmission. Also, continuous removal of mosquitoes decreases the chances of becoming infected with Dengue significantly. In the later part, an optimal control problem is formulated where a lesser number of people become infected due to time-dependent people's awareness regarding taking precaution and mosquito removal measures. The numerical simulation shows that the transmission of the virus among mosquitoes becomes lowest when both the control policies are implemented. So, from the overall analysis, it is observed that maintaining effective non-pharmaceutical precautions at an early stage and removing mosquitoes from the system at certain time intervals decrease the infection level significantly in the environment by reducing the probability of becoming infected.(c) 2021 International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (IMACS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据