4.3 Review

Prediction of the Remaining Useful Life of Supercapacitors

期刊

MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING
卷 2022, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2022/7620382

关键词

-

资金

  1. Youth Fund of Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation [ZR2020QE212]
  2. Key Projects of Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation [ZR2020KF020]
  3. Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation [ZR2020MF068]
  4. Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation [LY22E070007]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52007170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercapacitors, as a new type of energy-storage device, are widely used in various energy storage fields due to their advantages such as fast charging and discharging, high power density, and long cycle life. However, the degradation and failure of supercapacitors in large-scale applications can negatively impact the operation of the entire system. Therefore, accurately predicting the remaining useful life of supercapacitors is crucial for maximizing efficiency and timely replacement.
As a new type of energy-storage device, supercapacitors are widely used in various energy storage fields because of their advantages such as fast charging and discharging, high power density, wide operating temperature range, and long cycle life. However, the degradation and failure of supercapacitors in large-scale applications will adversely affect the operation of the whole system. To maximize the efficiency of supercapacitors without damaging the equipment and to ensure timely replacement before reaching the end of their useful life, it is critical to accurately predict the remaining useful life of supercapacitors. This paper presents a comprehensive review of model-based and data-driven approaches to predict the remaining useful life of supercapacitors, introduces the characteristics of the various methods, and foresees future trends, with the expectation of providing a reference for further research in this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据