4.4 Article

Assessing public financing for nutrition in Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka

期刊

MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13320

关键词

Bhutan; financing; malnutrition; Nepal; nutrition; public expenditures; Sri Lanka

资金

  1. Government of Japan (Japan Scaling Up Nutrition Trust Fund)
  2. European Commission (South Asia Food and Nutrition Security Initiative)
  3. UK Aid (South Asia Food and Nutrition Security Initiative)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed public financing for nutrition in Bhutan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, identifying limitations in available data and discussing policy implications. It revealed the need to prioritize evidence-based interventions and balance investments in nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions.
The objective of this study was to assess public financing for nutrition in Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka to identify limitations of available data and to discuss policy implications. A variant of the Scaling Up Nutrition Movement methodology was used. Budget allocations and expenditures for relevant government ministries during 2012-2018 were identified. Nutrition-related line items were tagged using definitions of nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions. Data were aggregated by year and calculated in constant United States dollars (USD). Expenditures by year were presented as a proportion of gross domestic product and general government expenditures. The percent utilization of budget allocations and proportion of funding from central government sources were determined. Per capita expenditures on nutrition-specific interventions varied from USD 1.08-8.76 and for nutrition-sensitive interventions varied from USD 20.22-51.20. Nutrition-specific expenditures as a percent of gross domestic product ranged from 0.08% in Sri Lanka in 2017% to 0.34% in Nepal in 2016. The median utilization rate was 64% for nutrition-specific and 84% for nutrition-sensitive interventions. Nutrition-specific funding financed by the central government was 90.7% in Bhutan and 99.4% in Sri Lanka. This study revealed the need to prioritize and invest in evidence-based interventions, including balancing investments in nutrition-specific versus -sensitive interventions. Challenges in estimation of nutrition expenditures and cross-country comparison were also observed, highlighting the need for appropriate nutrition line item tagging and standardized systems for data collection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据