4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

A small-scale creep test for calibrating an efficient lifetime model for high pressure turbine bladesEin miniaturisierter Kriechversuch zur Kalibrierung eines effizienten Lebensdauermodells fur Hochdruckturbinenschaufeln

期刊

MATERIALWISSENSCHAFT UND WERKSTOFFTECHNIK
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 440-448

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mawe.202100347

关键词

Nickel-based superalloy; lifetime prediction; creep; gas turbine blade; mechanical testing

资金

  1. Lufthansa Technik
  2. German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology [20T1308]
  3. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research develops a creep model based on experimental results and literature values to predict the lifetime of turbine blades in jet engines under real loading conditions.
Jet engines of airplanes are designed such that in some components damage occurs and accumulates in service without being critical up to a certain level of damage. Since maintenance, repair, and component exchange are very cost-intensive, it is necessary to predict efficiently the component lifetime with high accuracy. A former developed lifetime model, based on interpolated results of aerodynamic and structural mechanics simulations, uses material parameters estimated from literature values of standard creep experiments. For improved accuracy, an experimental procedure is developed for the characterization of the short-time creep behavior, which is relevant for the operation of turbine blades of jet engines. To consider microstructural influences resulting from the manufacturing of thin-walled single crystal turbine blades, small-scale specimens from used turbine blades are extracted and tested in short- and medium-time creep experiments. Based on experimental results and literature values, a creep model, which describes the fracture behavior for a wide range of creep loads, is calibrated and is now used for the lifetime prediction of turbine blades under real loading conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据