4.4 Article

Controlling the nucleation of multiple precipitates in precipitation-strengthened steel through Mo partitioning

期刊

MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 38, 期 12, 页码 876-881

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02670836.2022.2067613

关键词

Nanoparticles; Mo addition; Precipitation-strengthened steel; Atom probe tomography; First-principles calculation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1860103, 52101025]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2209003]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of lvliang [219114]
  4. Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Liaoning Province [2019-BS-254]
  5. Advanced Computing East China Sub-center
  6. LvLiang Cloud Computing Center of TianHe-2 of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the influence of Mo addition on multiple precipitates in high-strength ferritic steel was investigated using atom probe tomography and first-principles calculations. It was confirmed that a co-precipitate in the steel was nucleated from the abundance of Cu atoms. The addition of Mo accelerated the nucleation process of Cu-rich precipitates and structural transformation of co-precipitates, and significantly increased the nucleation rate of a NiAl-based precipitate.
In this study, atom probe tomography and first-principles calculations were used to investigate the influence of Mo addition on multiple precipitates, including isolated NiAl-based precipitates as well as NiAl-based and Cu-rich co-precipitates, in high-strength ferritic steel. The co-NiAl-based precipitates were experimentally confirmed to be nucleated from the abundance of Cu atoms. The addition of Mo accelerated the nucleation process of Cu-rich precipitates and structural transformation of co-precipitates, led to a considerable increase in the nucleation rate of NiAl-based precipitates, and slightly promoted isolated NiAl-based precipitates. The results were discussed from the perspective of lattice misfits and mixing enthalpy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据