4.7 Article

Synergistic enhancement of strength and ductility of cobalt-free maraging steel via nanometer-scaled microstructures

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.143099

关键词

Maraging steel; Dual-phase structure; Precipitation strengthening; Refinement of precipitates; Solution annealing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effect of solution treatment parameters on the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of cobalt-free maraging steel was investigated. The high strength and satisfactory ductility of the material were attributed to the specific distribution and microstructure of nano-sized precipitates. By annealing at a high temperature for a short time, finer and more precipitates could be obtained, leading to improved mechanical properties.
Maraging steel with ultra-high strength and good ductility is usually achieved via semi-coherent nanometer-sized precipitates and a dual-phase structure. In this work, we studied the effect of solution treatment parameters on the microstructural evolution and the mechanical properties of cobalt-free maraging steel, with high strength (1852 MPa) and satisfactory tensile elongation (11.5%) at room temperature was obtained. The nano-scaled precipitates in the martensite matrix were analyzed, in which the eta-Ni-3(Ti, Mo) precipitates were distributed in width of 7.1 nm and length of 19 nm. It was found that the needle-like Ni3Ti phase plays a predominant role in enhancing the strength of the maraging steel, while the ductility can be attributed to the nano laminated austenite structure, which could effectively prevent the propagation of microcracks in the martensite matrix. A heterogeneous microstructure of precipitates was formed in the martensite matrix. Besides, the size and number density of precipitates could be regulated by tuning the solution treatment conditions, in which a finer size and a larger number of precipitates could be gained by annealing at a high temperature for a short time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据