4.7 Article

Collapse of helium-filled voids in extreme deformation: Dislocation mechanisms

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.142712

关键词

Copper alloys; Plasticity; Modelling; simulations

资金

  1. Science Campaigns
  2. Center for Matter in Extreme Conditions [DE-NA0003842]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through the Los Alamos National Laboratory
  4. National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy [89233218CNA000001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms responsible for the collapse of helium-filled bubbles during the passage of shock waves in monocrystalline copper are revealed. Both empty and helium-filled bubbles serve as dislocation sources, generating intense, localized plastic regions. There are distinct differences in the collapse of empty voids compared to He-filled bubbles, the former requiring less stress and generating a greater density of dislocations for a given shock strength.
The mechanisms responsible for the collapse of helium-filled bubbles during the passage of shock waves in monocrystalline copper are revealed. Both internal pressure (caused by pre-existing helium atoms) and bubble size are varied in molecular dynamics simulations to understand the atomistic scale deformation as they are subjected to shock compression at pressures of 48, 123, and 170 GPa, corresponding to particle velocities of 1.0, 2.0, and 2.5 km/s. Both empty and helium filled bubbles serve as dislocation sources, generating intense, localized plastic regions. There are distinct differences in the collapse of empty voids compared to He-filled bubbles, the former requiring less stress and generating a greater density of dislocations for a given shock strength. A generalized model for dislocation emission is proposed, where the inclusion of shear stress generated by the helium bubble increases the critical stress to generate dislocations at the defect surface, demonstrating the change in plastic deformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据