4.6 Article

Pt-Fe nanoalloy: Structure evolution study and catalytic properties in water gas shift reaction

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2022.111727

关键词

Nanoalloy; Catalysis; Water gas shift reaction; Platinum; Hydrogen production

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [21-73-20203, 19-73-00157]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [AAAA-A21121011390009-1]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [21-73-20203, 19-73-00157] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the properties of Pt0.5Cu0.5, Pt0.5Fe0.5, Pt0.33Ag0.67, and Pt0.6Au0.4 nanoalloys in water gas shift (WGS) reaction were investigated for the first time. It was found that only Pt0.5Fe0.5 nanopowder showed activity, while Pt-FeOx metal-oxide composite was inert. The positive effect of Pt-Fe alloying on WGS performance was also confirmed for silica supported catalysts.
In the present work we studied the properties of Pt0.5Cu0.5, Pt0.5Fe0.5, Pt0.33Ag0.67, Pt0.6Au0.4 nanoalloys in water gas shift (WGS) reaction for the first time. Cu, Fe, Ag, Au were chosen as modifiers due to the low catalytic activity in undesirable side reactions of carbon oxides methanation. Nanoalloys were synthesized via corresponding double complex salts decomposition, which provided the selective formation of bimetallic nanoparticles. A simulated reformate gas mixture, containing (vol.%) 10 CO, 15 CO2, 30 H2O and 45 H-2, was used to evaluate the activity of these systems. Only Pt0.5Fe0.5 nanopowder was active, while Pt-FeOx metal-oxide composite was inert. The positive effect of Pt-Fe alloying on WGS performance was also confirmed for silica supported catalysts. TG and XRD in situ analysis reveal that Pt0.5Fe0.5 is stable toward oxidation under WGS reaction conditions (T < 350 degrees C, reductive atmosphere), while Pt-FeOx undergoes partial reduction but without formation of Pt-Fe alloy nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据