4.5 Article

Cellulosic graphene: growth, characterization, and fabrication toward ambient humidity sensing

期刊

MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
卷 37, 期 16, 页码 1850-1858

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2022.2065009

关键词

Cellulosic film; graphene; humidity sensor; onion peel; thermal exfoliation; hysteresis; sensitivity; stability; response time; nanomaterials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sensitive and cost-effective humidity sensor was fabricated using multilayer graphene synthesized through thermal exfoliation of cellulosic materials. The device showed better response time and stability compared to commercially available humidity sensors.
Monitoring environmental humidity using a sensitive, cost-effective device is a contemporary challenge. Considering various sensing materials, graphene has functioned as a best-suitable material for humidity sensing because of its favorable characteristics, for example, large reactive surface area (highly sensitive), better electrical conductivity (fast response of water adsorption), etc. A straightforward and bio-acceptable approach to growing multilayer graphene was formed by the thermal exfoliation process of cellulosic materials. The crystallite size, inter-layer distance, number of layers, crystalline defects, and crystalline planes orientation for synthesized cellulosic-graphene materials were characterized from X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Raman spectroscopy, and High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). Additionally, the elemental analysis was provided by Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. A market-ready product on humidity sensor was fabricated and studied the different parameters associated with sensing mechanism, for example, hysteresis effect with different temperature, effect on impedance with relative humidity, sensitivity, etc. The fabricated device's better response time and stability may be observed with commercially available humidity sensors (HIH5030 and DHT11H).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据