4.7 Article

Effect of trace metal contamination in sediments on the bioaccumulation of bivalve Meretrix meretrix

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113422

关键词

Bioaccumulation; Trace metals; Sediments; Meretrix meretrix

资金

  1. COMAPS laboratory, National Centre for Earth Science Studies (NCESS)
  2. Central Chemical Laboratory, National Centre for Earth Science Studies (NCESS)
  3. Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), Govt. of India
  4. National Centre for Earth Science Studies (NCESS), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This quinquennial study evaluated the bioaccumulation pattern of trace metals in Meretrix meretrix. It found a strong association between the concentration of trace metals in the clam and the corresponding metal concentration in the sediments. The study also discovered that the intake of trace metals by the clam is influenced by seasonal variation, chemical speciation, and metabolic stress.
A quinquennial seasonal study (2015-2019) has been conducted to evaluate the bioaccumulation pattern of trace metals in Meretrix meretrix. The concentration of trace metals in the clam was observed as Cr > Cu > Ni > Zn > Pb > Cd > Hg, (Body > Mantle > Gills), similar to sediments. Contamination Factor of Cu and Cr in sediments showed strong association with the corresponding metal concentration in the body (r = 0.687, r = 0.962), mantle (r = 0.880, r = 0.956) and gills (r = 0.937, r = 0.863). Bioconcentration Factor was high for Cr followed by Ni. Mean Metal Concentration Rate (MMCR) of Cr was high and Hg was low (Body > Mantle > Gills). Our study establishes that the trace metal intake by Meretrix meretrix is associated with seasonal variation, physicochemical factors, sediment texture, chemical speciation and the metabolic stress created within the species induced from increased demand for protein synthesis. The latter resulted in the augmented rate of accumulation of Cu and Cr.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据