4.3 Article

Quantifying the response of Blainville's beaked whales to US naval sonar exercises in Hawaii

期刊

MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 1549-1565

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12944

关键词

behavioral response; Blainville's beaked whales; generalized additive model; Mesoplodon densirostris; mid-frequency active sonar; passive acoustic data

资金

  1. US Navy Living Marine Resources Program [N39430-17-P-1983]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the behavioral responses of Blainville's beaked whales to naval use of mid-frequency active sonar in Hawaii and the Bahamas. The results indicate a stronger reaction to naval training and sonar than previously reported.
Behavioral responses of beaked whales (family Ziphiidae) to naval use of mid-frequency active sonar (MFAS) have been quantified for some species and regions. We describe the effects of MFAS on the probability of detecting diving groups of Blainville's beaked whales on the U.S. Navy Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) in Hawaii and compare our results to previously published results for the same species at the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (AUTEC) in the Bahamas. We use passive acoustic data collected at bottom-mounted hydrophones before and during six naval training exercises at PMRF along with modelled sonar received levels to describe the effect of training and MFAS on foraging groups of Blainville's beaked whales. We use a multistage generalized additive modeling approach to control for the underlying spatial distribution of vocalizations under baseline conditions. At an MFAS received level of 150 dB re 1 mu Pa rms the probability of detecting groups of Blainville's beaked whales decreases by 77%, 95% CI [67%, 84%] compared to periods when general training activity was ongoing and by 87%, 95% CI [81%, 91%] compared to baseline conditions. Our results indicate a more pronounced response to naval training and MFAS than has been previously reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据