4.5 Review

Hyperpolarized 129Xe imaging of the brain: Achievements and future challenges

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 83-105

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29200

关键词

brain; HP Xe-129 brain imaging; hyperpolarized xenon-129; magnetic resonance imaging; spectroscopy; perfusion imaging

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MRC - MR/M008894/1]
  2. Mitacs Elevate [IT25574]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2017-05359]
  4. Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association [A-18-05]
  5. Ontario Research Foundation [ORF RE 09 029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperpolarized Xe-129 brain MRI is a promising imaging technique for functional and perfusion imaging. It has been studied in animals and humans, showing potential value for clinical diagnosis in the future.
Hyperpolarized (HP) xenon-129 (Xe-129) brain MRI is a promising imaging modality currently under extensive development. HP Xe-129 is nontoxic, capable of dissolving in pulmonary blood, and is extremely sensitive to the local environment. After dissolution in the pulmonary blood, HP Xe-129 travels with the blood flow to the brain and can be used for functional imaging such as perfusion imaging, hemodynamic response detection, and blood-brain barrier permeability assessment. HP Xe-129 MRI imaging of the brain has been performed in animals, healthy human subjects, and in patients with Alzheimer's disease and stroke. In this review, the overall progress in the field of HP Xe-129 brain imaging is discussed, along with various imaging approaches and pulse sequences used to optimize HP Xe-129 brain MRI. In addition, current challenges and limitations of HP Xe-129 brain imaging are discussed, as well as possible methods for their mitigation. Finally, potential pathways for further development are also discussed. HP Xe-129 MRI of the brain has the potential to become a valuable novel perfusion imaging technique and has the potential to be used in the clinical setting in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据