4.7 Article

Boron-Based Lewis Pairs Catalyzed Living, Regioselective, and Topology-Controlled Polymerization of (E, E)-Alkyl Sorbates

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR RAPID COMMUNICATIONS
卷 43, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/marc.202200088

关键词

cyclic polymers; Lewis pairs polymerization; living polymerization; regioselectivity; renewable conjugated diene

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22071077, 21871242]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Realizing living and controlled polymerization of renewable monomers using boron-based Lewis pairs remains a great challenge. In this study, strong nucleophilic N-heterocyclic olefins (NHOs) or N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) as Lewis bases, and boron-based compounds as Lewis acids were used to construct LPs for polymerization of alkyl sorbates. The results show that specific combinations of B(C6F5)(3) with appropriate acidity and steric hindrance, along with strong nucleophilic NHOs, promote living and controlled polymerization of alkyl sorbates, leading to polymers with predicted molecular weight and narrow molecular weight distribution.
It remains as a great challenge to realize living and controlled polymerization of renewable monomers by the boron-based Lewis pairs. Here, strong nucleophilic N-heterocyclic olefins (NHOs) or N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) as Lewis bases, and boron-based compounds as Lewis acids, are employed to construct LPs for polymerization of alkyl sorbates, including (E, E)-methyl sorbate and (E, E)-ethyl sorbate. Systematic investigation reveals that the combinations of B(C6F5)(3) with appropriate acidity and steric hindrance, and strong nucleophilic NHOs promote living and controlled polymerization of alkyl sorbates in 100% 1,4-addition manner, furnishing polymers with predicted molecular weight (M-w up to 56.6 kg mol(-1)) and narrow molecular weight distribution (D as low as 1.12). Furthermore, topology analysis shows that NHC1/B(C6F5)(3) LP produce PMS possessing cyclic structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据