4.7 Article

Evaluation of physicochemical properties, equivalent umami concentration and antioxidant activity of Coprinus comatus prepared by different drying methods

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 162, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113479

关键词

Coprinus comatus; Antioxidant capacity; Phenolic compounds; Umami components; Drying methods

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871849]
  2. Leading Talent Project of Science and Technology Innovation in Zhejiang Province [2019R52041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different drying methods have varying effects on the drying efficiency and quality of Coprinus comatus. Freeze drying is better at preserving antioxidants, while infrared drying shows potential in producing Coprinus comatus with high umami concentration.
Coprinus comatus contains a variety of bioactive and umami compounds and is regarded as the rising star of fungi. To maximally maintain its quality, the physicochemical and antioxidant properties of C. comatus were investigated and compared, after undergoing hot air drying (HAD), infrared drying (IRD), microwave drying (MD) and freeze drying (FD). Results showed that different drying methods have their respective advantages. FD sample showed the lowest color difference and highest rehydration ratio, as well as provided the highest retention of gallic acid (223.76 mu g/g) and protocatechuic acid (336.67 mu g/g), thereby demonstrating highest free radicals (DPPH. and ABTS.) scavenging activity. MD significantly retained polysaccharide (113.36 mg/g), coumaric acid (13.36 mu g/g) and p-hydroxybenzoic acid (35.09 mu g/g), and exhibited higher ferric reducing antioxidant power. IRD and HAD led to higher contents of monosodium glutamate-like free amino acids and flavor 5 '-nucleotide. In addition, IRD sample had the highest equivalent umami concentration value (1145.73 g MSG/100 g). Comprehensively, FD was better to preserve the antioxidants, while IRD would be a potential method to produce dried C. comatus with high umami concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据