4.7 Article

Effects of salidroside on functional and structural changes in highland barley proteins

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113310

关键词

Highland barley; Non-covalent interactions; Conformational changes; Antioxidant ability

资金

  1. Qinghai Provincial Science and Technology Basic Research Program, China [2021-ZJ-712]
  2. Xining Science and Technology Planning Program, China [2020-Y-15, 2021-Y-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the changes in highland barley proteins (HBPs) when interacting with salidroside. The results show that salidroside can alter the free sulfhydryl contents, fluorescence intensity, and surface properties of HBPs, and enhance their emulsifying and foaming properties. These findings suggest that salidroside has the potential to improve the structural characteristics and functional properties of HBPs.
This study investigates the functional and conformational changes in highland barley proteins (HBPs)-salidroside complexes formed by non-covalent bond interactions. The free sulfhydryl contents of HBPs are decreased from 37.65 +/- 1.90 mu mol/g protein to 18.86 +/- 0.14 mu mol/g protein after binding with salidroside. The fluorescence spectroscopy show that two fluorescence peaks are observed and salidroside enhance the fluorescence intensity of HBPs at the high addition level of salidroside (0.5-1 mmol/g protein). Secondary structure, surface hydrophobicity, and Zeta potential of HBPs are also changed by salidroside with different addition level (0-1 mmol/g protein). HBPs-salidroside complexes exhibit better functional properties (emulsifying and foaming properties) than HBPs, which is probably due to conformational changes in the HBPs. The combination of HBPs and salidroside increase the antioxidant ability of HBPs. Overall, salidroside has the potential to improve the structural characteristics and functional properties of HBPs, especially their antioxidant ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据