4.7 Article

Development of heat-stable gelatin-coated nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC): Colloidal and stability properties

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113265

关键词

Nano-structured lipid carriers; Gelatin coating; Vitamin D- 3 stability; Oil fortification & nbsp;

资金

  1. Food Biophysic Laboratory of Tabriz University and Drug Applied Research Center of Tabriz Univer-sity of Medical Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heat stable vitamin D-3 loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) were developed using edible solid lipids and liquid oil. The properties of NLCs were affected by the type of solid lipid, the ratio of solid-to-liquid lipid, and the surfactant composition. Comparison was made between NLCs and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs). The stability of vitamin D3 in the NLCs was higher than in margarine-based ones during cooking and frying of oil.
Heat stable vitamin D-3 loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) were developed by edible solid lipids with high melting points (beeswax and margarine) and alpha-tocopherol as liquid oil. These NLCs were coated by gelatin to be spray dried and easily portable. The effect of solid lipid type (beeswax or margarine), solid-to-liquid lipid ratio, and surfactant composition (Tween-80/polyglycerol ester) on mean particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of NLCs were studied. Results showed that the beeswax-based NLC had higher mean size and EE (%) than the margarine-based ones. The morphology and polymorphic structures of selected formulations of NLCs were studied and compared with their solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs). Gelatin was used for coating NLC particles during spray drying of NLC suspensions. Vitamin D-3 was stable in both beeswax and margarine-based NLCs during two months' storage at ambient temperature. However, the stability of vitamin D3 in the beeswax-based NLCs was higher than in margarine-based ones during cooking and frying of oil.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据