4.1 Article

BDD-BASED ALGORITHM FOR SCC DECOMPOSITION OF EDGE-COLOURED GRAPHS

期刊

出版社

LOGICAL METHODS COMPUTER SCIENCE E V
DOI: 10.46298/LMCS-18(1:38)2022

关键词

strongly connected components; symbolic algorithm; edge-coloured digraphs; saturation; systems biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Edge-coloured directed graphs are essential for modelling and analyzing complex systems in various scientific disciplines. This paper proposes a novel algorithm that symbolically computes all the monochromatic strongly connected components of an edge-coloured graph. The algorithm is evaluated using an experimental implementation based on binary decision diagrams (BDDs), and its effectiveness is demonstrated.
Edge-coloured directed graphs provide an essential structure for modelling and analysis of complex systems arising in many scientific disciplines (e.g. feature-oriented systems, gene regulatory networks, etc.). One of the fundamental problems for edge-coloured graphs is the detection of strongly connected components, or SCCs. The size of edge-coloured graphs appearing in practice can be enormous both in the number of vertices and colours. The large number of vertices prevents us from analysing such graphs using explicit SCC detection algorithms, such as Tarjan's, which motivates the use of a symbolic approach. However, the large number of colours also renders existing symbolic SCC detection algorithms impractical. This paper proposes a novel algorithm that symbolically computes all the monochromatic strongly connected components of an edge-coloured graph. In the worst case, the algorithm performs O(p . n . log n) symbolic steps, where p is the number of colours and n is the number of vertices. We evaluate the algorithm using an experimental implementation based on binary decision diagrams (BDDs). Specifically, we use our implementation to explore the SCCs of a large collection of coloured graphs (up to 2(48)) obtained from Boolean networks - a modelling framework commonly appearing in systems biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据