4.6 Article

Spatial declustering of zircon data indicate rapid Archean crustal growth and Neoproterozoic plate tectonic equilibrium

期刊

LITHOS
卷 418, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2022.106687

关键词

Continental growth; Crustal evolution; Hf-isotopes; Detrital zircon; Declustering; Tectonic equilibrium

资金

  1. Zircon database

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Constraining the growth and evolution of the continental crust provides insight into the secular change of tectono-magmatic processes through time. However, previous global compilations of Lu-Hf isotopes of zircon suffer from sample clustering and spatial bias issues. By applying a geographic declustering algorithm, a more representative dataset reveals that the continental crust grew much faster and suggests that continental growth is a feature of pre-plate tectonic magmatic processes.
Constraining the growth and evolution of the continental crust provides insight into the secular change of tectono-magmatic processes through time. Radiogenic isotope pairs such as 176Lu/176Hf are commonly used to track the growth rates of the continental crust. Previous studies utilizing global compilations of Lu-Hf isotopes of zircon to query continental growth through time. However, we show that sample clustering and spatial bias lead to erroneous interpretations and casts doubt as to the representativeness of global zircon compilations. To ameliorate this issue, we apply a geographic declustering algorithm to remove the spatial bias in the nonrepresentative dataset. A more representative declustered dataset indicates that the continental crust grew much faster than previous assessments have proposed. We further speculate that the transition to modern-style tectonics (as heralded by the appearance of low temperature-high pressure metamorphism) was accompanied by little to no net continental growth and propose that continental growth may be a feature of pre-plate tectonic magmatic processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据