4.1 Article

Organic matter seasonality and ecosystem metabolism in two tropical first-order streams

期刊

LIMNETICA
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 325-338

出版社

ASOC ESPAN LIMNOL-MISLATA
DOI: 10.23818/limn.41.19

关键词

particulate organic matter; dissolved organic matter; standing stocks; organic matter inputs; Lacandona rainforest; Mexico

资金

  1. Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia, UNAM
  2. CONACYT
  3. FORDECYT-CONACYT [273646]
  4. PAPIIT [IN216818]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dissolved and particulate organic matter are the energy source for secondary production in forested streams. Seasonal variation is mainly influenced by the rainfall pattern and hydrology. However, environmental parameters and organic matter stock and input are not good predictors of stream metabolism.
Dissolved and particulate organic matter are the energy source for secondary production in forested streams. Cycling of organic matter and stream ecosystem functioning are linked to organic matter input and storage capacity and timing. This study assessed the seasonal variation (dry and rainy seasons) of environmental parameters, organic matter stock and input, and stream metabolism in two first-order tropical streams in the Selva Lacandona, Mexico. We also aimed to identify the drivers of organic matter and stream metabolism seasonality. We found seasonal variation in organic matter stock and input correlated with tropical seasonality. Dissolved organic matter and seston increased in the rainy season, while benthic primary producers and leaf litter stock and input increased in the dry season correlated with lower water discharge. Gross primary production increased in the dry season, while ecosystem respiration did not differ between seasons. Seasonality defined by the rainfall pattern and its effect on stream hydrology is the main driver of organic matter dynamics in tropical streams. However, environmental parameters and organic matter stock and input were not good predictors of stream metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据