4.7 Article

Long-term efficacy, safety and neurotolerability of MATRix regimen followed by autologous transplant in primary CNS lymphoma: 7-year results of the IELSG32 randomized trial

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 1870-1878

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-022-01582-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. IELSG
  2. Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (Ricerca Indipendente) [FARM99FS3Y]
  3. Cancer Research UK [C36711/A12115, CRUK/10/023]
  4. Oncosuisse [KLS 02399-02-2009]
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003B_132924]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reported the results of a trial involving 219 HIV-negative adults with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). The results showed that MATRix significantly improves outcome in patients with PCNSL, with a long-term overall survival rate of 21%-56%. Addition of rituximab benefits patients, and the efficacy of whole-brain irradiation and autologous transplantation is comparable. Salvage therapy was ineffective. Importantly, MATRix and ASCT did not increase non-relapse mortality or second tumor incidence, and the side effects differed between WBRT and ASCT.
219 HIV-negative adults <= 70 years with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) were enrolled in the randomized IELSG32 trial. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive methotrexate-cytarabine (arm A), or methotrexate-cytarabine-rituximab (B), or methotrexate-cytarabine-thiotepa-rituximab (MATRix; arm C). A second randomization allocated patients with responsive/stable disease to whole-brain irradiation (WBRT) or carmustine-thiotepa-conditioned autologous transplantation (ASCT). First results, after a median follow-up of 30 months, showed that MATRix significantly improves outcome, with both WBRT and ASCT being similarly effective. However, sound assessment of overall survival (OS), efficacy of salvage therapy, late complications, secondary tumors, and cognitive impairment requires longer follow-up. Herein, we report the results of this trial at a median follow-up of 88 months. As main findings, MATRix was associated with excellent long-lasting outcome, with a 7-year OS of 21%, 37%, and 56% respectively for arms A, B, and C. Notably, patients treated with MATRix and consolidation had a 7-year OS of 70%. The superiority of arm B on arm A suggests a benefit from the addition of rituximab. Comparable efficacy of WBRT and ASCT was confirmed. Salvage therapy was ineffective; benefit was recorded only in patients with late relapse re-treated with methotrexate. Eight (4%) patients developed a second cancer. Importantly, MATRix and ASCT did not result in higher non-relapse mortality or second tumors incidence. Patients who received WBRT experienced impairment in attentiveness and executive functions, whereas patients undergoing ASCT experienced improvement in these functions as well as in memory and quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据