4.3 Article

Analysis of the discharge plasma impedance of copper vapor laser

期刊

LASER PHYSICS
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1555-6611/ac603b

关键词

discharge plasma; pulse discharge; pulse power supply; impedance analysis; copper vapor laser

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel approach to analyze the impedance of high-voltage discharge plasma in copper vapor lasers (CVLs) based on experimental results. The method accurately calculates the resistance and inductance of the discharge plasma. The paper also investigates the variations of laser impedance with time, pressure, operating voltage, and electrode pin configuration, and proposes a method to maintain stable laser power.
In the pursuit to analyze the impedance of copper vapor lasers (CVLs) in different conditions, a novel approach has been proposed in this paper. The underdamped behavior of the voltage waveform across the CVL is leveraged to compute the impedance of high-voltage discharge plasma in the laser. This methodology provides an accurate idea of the discharge plasma resistance and inductance as it is calculated on the basis of experimental voltage waveforms obtained from the laser system. The laser head inductance remains almost fixed and equivalent to similar to 0.47 mu H whereas the laser resistance changes between 34 omega and 11 omega depending on the discharge condition and its constituents. A critical evaluation of CVL impedance is done in all experimentally possible conditions, and a methodology has been proposed to maintain the CVL impedance, which results in the power stability of the laser in oscillator-amplifier configuration. The laser impedance variation w.r.t. time, pressure, operating voltage and electrode pin configuration has been investigated. The impact of the localized electric field at the electrode on the laser resistance has also been emphasized in this paper. A good concurrence exists between the calculated laser impedance and its experimental behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据