4.6 Article

Successive Rebounds of Impinging Water Droplets on Superhydrophobic Surfaces

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 38, 期 12, 页码 3860-3867

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00114

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12102371]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the bouncing behavior of water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces and finds a nonmonotonic relationship between the restitution coefficient and the Weber number. Droplet-surface friction limits the rebound height, and above a critical value, viscous friction dominates. Semiempirical formulas are proposed to describe the restitution coefficient, allowing for the prediction of successive rebounds.
When a water droplet strikes a superhydrophobic surface, there may be several to a few tens of rebounds before it comes to rest. Although this intriguing multiphase flow phenomenon has received a great deal of attention from interfacial scientists and engineers, the underlying dynamics have not yet been completely resolved. In this paper, we report on an experimental investigation into the bouncing behavior of water droplets impinging on macroscopically flat superhydrophobic surfaces. We show that the restitution coefficient, which quantifies the energy consumed during impact and rebound, exhibits a nonmonotonic dependence on the Weber number. It is the droplet-surface friction that restricts the rebound height of the impinging droplet, so its restitution coefficient increases with the Weber number when the impact velocity is below a critical value. Above this value, the viscous friction within a thin liquid layer close to the superhydrophobic surface becomes dominant, and thus, the restitution coefficient decreases sharply. On the basis of energy analyses, semiempirical formulas are proposed to describe the restitution coefficient, and these can be employed to predict the number of successive rebounds of impinging droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据