4.6 Article

Study on the Impact of Na/Ca Bentonites on the Dispersion Performance of Conventional and Modified Phosphate Polycarboxylate Superplasticizers in Cement Mortar

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 38, 期 18, 页码 5803-5811

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c00408

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [18QB1403200, 17520730200, 15DZ2282500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of different types and dosages of bentonite on the dispersion properties of bentonite-containing cement mortar were studied. It was found that TPEG-PCE exhibited superior dispersing performance, making it a viable alternative.
Through molecular structure design, modified polycarboxylate superplasticizers (PCEs) were synthesized via copolymerization using isoprenyl oxy polyethylene glycol) ether (TPEG), acrylic acid, and hydroxyethyl methacrylate phosphate. TPEG-PCEs were selected as potential dispersants for Na/Ca-bentonite containing cement mortar. Other two kinds of commercial PCE that were obtained based on methallyl ether (HPEG) and ethylene-glycol monovinyl polyethylene glycol (EPEG) as macromonomers were also applied in the mortar. The effects of the type of bentonite and its dosage, as well as the monomer structure of PCEs and the type of cement, on the dispersion properties of the bentonite-containing mortar were studied. According to the findings, the initial fluidity of the mortar was reduced by about 20 mm when two kinds of bentonite were used. Applying 3% Ca-bentonite resulted in 40% flow loss in the mortar after 1 h. The fluidity of the mortar with Na-bentonite exhibited lower dispersion ability than that with Ca-bentonite when HPEG-PCE and EPEG-PCE were chosen as dispersants. The TPEG-PCE exhibited superior dispersing performance over HPEG-PCE and EPEG-PCE and exerted a retarding effect on cement, being also weakly sensitive to clay content. Thus, TPEG-PCEs with phosphate groups present a viable alternative to conventional PCEs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据