4.7 Article

Examining the potential to expand wildlife-supporting residential yards and gardens

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104396

关键词

Residential landscapes; Wildlife gardens; Yard management; Biological conservation; Urban ecology

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Macrosystems Biology program [MSB FRA 1638725, 1638648, 1638519]
  2. Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research Program [DEB-1832016]
  3. Baltimore Long-Term Ecological Research Program [DEB 1637661]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1638519] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1638648] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that residential yards play a crucial role in providing habitat for urban wildlife. However, little research has focused on understanding people's decisions to adopt wildlife-supporting yards. The study found potential to increase yard complexity and vegetation diversity by adding shrubs and native plants. Hobby gardening was a significant motivator for those who have adopted wildlife yard features, while the desire for low maintenance yards was a constraint among non-adopters. Neighborhood and homeowner associations were found to promote the adoption of wildlife-supporting yards.
Research has demonstrated that residential yards can provide important habitat for urban birds, pollinators, and other wildlife. In addition, the motivations and constraints underlying decisions to manage traditional lawns, water-conserving yards, native plants, and other landscape types are well understood. Yet relatively little research has addressed people's decisions to adopt wildlife-supporting yards. Analyzing survey data from six U.S. cities, we address three related questions: 1) to what extent do residents choose yard features that support wildlife habitat?; 2) how do yard priorities and neighborhood governance, along with socio-demographic factors, explain the adoption of wildlife-supporting features?; and 3) how do residents who have already adopted wildlife-supporting yard features differ in their motivations from those who plan to adopt such features and those who do not? We found significant potential for adding vegetation (specifically shrubs and native plants) and other wildlife-supporting features to increase yard complexity and vegetation diversity. While gardening as a hobby was a significant motivator for people who have adopted wildlife yard features, the desire for low maintenance yards is a constraint among non-adopters. We therefore recommend promoting the planting of low-maintenance plant species or varieties that provide wildlife habitat but require little upkeep, especially among residents who would like to attract wildlife to their yards into the future. We also found that neighbourhood and homeowner associations increase the local adoption of wildlife-supporting yards. Coupled with other findings, our results underscore the importance of tailoring residential landscape features to diverse lifestyles while leveraging social institutions to expand wildlife habitat across urban and suburban neighborhoods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据