4.3 Article

2021 Guideline for Management of Patients With Lower-Extremity Wounds Due to Diabetes Mellitus and/or Neuropathic Disease

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000860

关键词

Charcot foot; Charcot neuropathy; Clinical practice guideline; Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic foot ulcer; Lower-extremity wound; Peripheral neuropathy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides an executive summary of the WOCN's guideline for management of patients with lower-extremity wounds due to diabetes mellitus and/or neuropathic disease. The summary includes an overview of the systematic process used to develop the guideline, as well as recommendations for screening, diagnosis, assessment, and management and education of these patients. The guideline is a valuable resource for healthcare professionals working with this patient population.
This article provides an executive summary of the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society's (WOCN) 2021 Guideline for Management of Patients With Lower-Extremity wounds Due to Diabetes Mellitus and/or Neuropathic Disease. This executive summary presents an overview of the systematic process used to update and develop the guideline and recommendations from the guideline for screening and diagnosis, assessment, and management and education of patients with lower-extremity wounds due to diabetes mellitus and/or neuropathic disease. In addition, the executive summary provides suggestions for implementing recommendations from the guideline. The guideline is a resource for WOC nurse specialists and other nurses and health care professionals who work with adults who have/or are at risk for lower-extremity wounds due to diabetes mellitus/neuropathic disease. The complete guideline includes the evidence and references supporting the recommendations, and it is available in print and electronically from the Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society, 1120 Rt 73, Suite 200, Mount Laurel, New Jersey, 08054; Web site: www.wocn.org.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据