4.7 Article

Multi-objective optimal design of TMDs for increasing critical flutter wind speed of bridges

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104992

关键词

Long-span bridge; Sectional model; Tuned mass dampers; Complex eigenvalue method; Critical flutter wind speed; Multi-objective optimization

资金

  1. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [107.01-2017.306]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel approach to optimize the parameters of Tuned Mass Dampers (TMDs) in long-span bridge models, aiming to increase the critical flutter wind speed of the system while minimizing the mass of the TMDs. The results show that the proposed approach significantly improves the critical flutter wind speed when optimized TMDs are installed.
Tuned mass dampers (TMDs) to improve long-span bridges' critical flutter wind speed have been widely investigated. However, the optimization of the parameters of TMDs to increase the aerodynamic stability of the long-span bridge girders in the most efficient way has not been properly considered. The present study shows a novel approach in optimizing the parameters of TMDs installed in the sectional model of the long-span bridge to maximize the critical flutter wind speed of the system based on a multi-objective optimization method. The objective functions, maximizing critical flutter wind speed and minimizing TMDs' mass, are included simultaneously. The configuration parameters of TMDs are considered as design variables. Balancing composite motion optimization (BCMO), a recently published meta-heuristic optimization algorithm, is utilized as the optimization tool in this research. The present study can be considered as the primary research in multi-objective optimization of the bridge-TMDs systems. The simulation results indicate that when installing optimized TMDs, the critical flutter wind speed of the system is significantly increased. The proposed approach can be extended to design long-span bridges optimally with other devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据