4.3 Article

Response Surfaces for Water Distribution System Pipe Roughness Calibration

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001518

关键词

Hydraulic modeling; Fitness landscape; Sensitivity analysis; Uncertainties

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1762862]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1762862] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the impact of uncertainties on the calibration of water distribution system (WDS) models. The results show that even with uncertainties, the response surfaces remain smooth and convex, but there are deviations between the best parameter solutions and the true solutions.
Water distribution system (WDS) model calibration research has focused on estimating model input/output parameters and analyzing several uncertainties (e.g., model uncertainty) to improve models with best-fit parameters. Numerous studies have shown that optimization algorithms generally quickly converge to very good parameter solutions. However, the generality and reasoning behind this have not been identified. This paper examines the shape and convexity of WDS response surfaces (i.e., objective function surfaces) and whether the surfaces have single global or multiple local optima. To that end, three networks with different network topologies are evaluated: (1) the Modena network as presented, (2) a modified form of the Modena network, and (3) a real Austrian network. Various conditions were evaluated to consider field measurement error, parameter uncertainty through pipe grouping, and model uncertainty. Results demonstrate that the response surfaces remained smooth and convex even when uncertainties are introduced, but the best parameter solutions are shifted from the true solution. The impact and sensitivities of the uncertainties are evaluated by examining the change in best-fit parameter estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据