4.4 Article

Olaparib tablet formulation: effect of food on the pharmacokinetics after oral dosing in patients with advanced solid tumours

期刊

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 723-729

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-015-2836-2

关键词

Olaparib; Food effect; Tablet; PARP inhibition; PK

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Cancer Research UK (CRUK)
  3. Department of Health as Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The oral PARP inhibitor olaparib has shown efficacy in patients with BRCA-mutated cancer. This Phase I, open-label, three-part study (Parts A-C) in patients with advanced solid tumours evaluated the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of olaparib when administered in tablet formulation. PK data were obtained in Part A using a two-treatment period crossover design; single-dose olaparib 300 mg (two 150 mg tablets) was administered in two prandial states: fasted and fed. In Part B, patients received olaparib tablets (300 mg bid) for 5 days under fasting conditions; in Part C, patients were allowed continued access to olaparib. Safety was assessed throughout, with data reported for Parts A and B. A total of 60 and 56 patients were evaluable for safety and PK analyses, respectively; 57 patients entered Part B. Rate of olaparib absorption was slower in the presence of food (t (max) delayed by 2.5 h), resulting in a statistically significant similar to 21 % decrease in peak plasma exposure (C (max)) [ratio of geometric means (90 % CI), 0.79 (0.72, 0.86)] but only a marginal increase in olaparib absorption (AUC(0-a)) [ratio of geometric means (90 % CI), 1.08 (1.01, 1.16)]. The point estimate and 90 % CI for the AUC(0-a) treatment ratio were within pre-defined bioequivalence limits (0.80-1.25). Adverse event data were consistent with the known safety profile of olaparib. Results of this study showed that a high-fat meal decreases the rate of absorption and peak exposure to olaparib 300 mg tablets, although in the absence of an effect on the extent of olaparib absorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据