4.5 Article

Genetic parameters for milk fatty acids, milk yield and quality traits of a Holstein cattle population reared under tropical conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS
卷 133, 期 5, 页码 384-395

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12205

关键词

Correlation; dairy cattle; genomics; heritability; single nucleotide polymorphism; somatic cell score

资金

  1. FAPESP [2010/12929-6, 2012/15948-7]
  2. CNPq
  3. CAPES
  4. Clinica do Leite
  5. Department of Animal Science, Escola Superior de Agricultura 'Luiz de Queiroz' (University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba - SP, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Information about genetic parameters is essential for selection decisions and genetic evaluation. These estimates are population specific; however, there are few studies with dairy cattle populations reared under tropical and sub-tropical conditions. Thus, the aim was to obtain estimates of heritability and genetic correlations for milk yield and quality traits using pedigree and genomic information from a Holstein population maintained in a tropical environment. Phenotypic records (n=36457) of 4203 cows as well as the genotypes for 57368 single nucleotide polymorphisms from 755 of these cows were used. Covariance components were estimated using the restricted maximum likelihood method under a mixed animal model, considering a pedigree-based relationship matrix or a combined pedigree-genomic matrix. High heritabilities (around 0.30) were estimated for lactose and protein content in milk whereas moderate values (between 0.19 and 0.26) were obtained for percentages of fat, saturated fatty acids and palmitic acid in milk. Genetic correlations ranging from -0.38 to -0.13 were determined between milk yield and composition traits. The smaller estimates compared to other similar studies can be due to poor environmental conditions, which may reduce genetic variability. These results highlight the importance in using genetic parameters estimated in the population under evaluation for selection decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据